Thursday, November 26, 2009

The Heidelberg Catechism


Question 1. What is thy only comfort in life and death?

That I with body and soul, both in life and death,am not my own, but belong unto my faithful Saviour Jesus Christ; who, with his precious blood, has fully satisfied for all my sins, and delivered me from all the power of the devil; and so preserves me that without the will of my heavenly Father, not a hair can fall from my head; yea, that all things must be subservient to my salvation, and therefore, by his Holy Spirit, He also assures me of eternal life, and makes me sincerely willing and ready, henceforth, to live unto him.


At Mandai crematorium,
I saw the somber reality of life; that is death.
This catechism came to mind.
What is my only comfort in life and in death?

Sunday, November 8, 2009

WHO IS THIS DIVIDED MAN?

INTRODUCTION


There is a dilemma of Christian perfectionism and it is reflected in how one is perceived by themselves with regard to sin and perfection. Generally people have an affinity towards wanting to know what perfection is, and here, Christian perfection is in question, can it be had?
Benjamin Warfield did a study and observed “rationalists who were very much concerned with the ‘miserable-sinner Christianity’ of the Reformers and efforts were directed in an attempt to show that the Apostle Paul thought of Christians as sinless” .
The attempt made by the rationalists propelled implications across to which this research aims to discuss. Is the man in Romans 7:14-25 the regenerate Paul expressing his torment in his struggle against sin or is he the unregenerate Paul whom is made out to be? If he was the regenerate Paul, Christian perfectionism does not and cannot stand. But if it was the unregenerate Paul, it is without dispute that Christians are and should be sinless.
The consequence of Christian perfectionism led to J.I Packer’s near mental breakdown and would concur the same would be with many who seeks perfection. J. I Packer empathically describes his experience:
“I scrapped my inside, figuratively speaking, to find things to yield to the Lord so as to make consecration complete, and I worked hard to ‘let go and let God’ when temptation made its presence felt. at that time I did not know that Harry Ironside, sometime pastor of Moody Memorial Church, Chicago, once drove himself into a full-scale mental breakdown through trying to find the secret that I was trying to find. . . , . . . as I have concluded since, that the higher Christian life as I was conceiving it is an unreality, . . . So I must scrape my inside yet again to find whatever maggots of unconsecrated selfhood still lurked there. A few months of this left me, as can be imagined, fairly frantic.”


These sentiments are shared among Christians who seeks so earnestly and fervently to consecrate their lives, but at the same time a sense of helplessness to succumb to their indwelling sin takes the Christian to state of which he feels that he can never attain complete consecration.
Therefore, the thesis of this research seeks to find out who the divided man is in Romans 7:14-25 and the implications it has on Christian living with regards to perfectionism and God’s progressive work of sanctifying the believer.








WHY IT IS THE CHRISTIAN PAUL WHO RELATES HIS DILEMMATIC EXPERIENCE
Use of Present Tenses
In Romans 7:14-25, it is the Christian Paul who relates his dilemmatic experience. Leon Morris has observed “that Paul consistently employed the use of the present tense in reference very much to himself”. Moreover, Dr Martyn Lloyd Jones pointed out “this lies in contrast to preceding verses (vv. 7-13) where the past tense is used with concern to himself and the law” .
Ubiquitous ‘I’ Found

Leon Morris expressed that “The use of ‘I’ or the Greek word, Ego, was used six times” is notable . However, Douglas Moo, observed “that ἐγώ ; ego had been employed seven times in verse 15 alone” . This frequent usage accentuates that the word ‘I’ or ‘ego’ is employed ubiquitously in the text which evinces that Paul is relating from personal experience.
Postulation of Paul Being ‘Fleshly’ and Not in the Flesh

William Hendriksen noted “that when Paul says ‘The law is Spiritual; but I am unspiritual’. The apostle does not imply that he is in the flesh that and that he is being controlled by the sinful nature as it is ascribed to an unbeliever. Instead, to be carnal or fleshly means that one is contrary to what is prescribed by the law. So while the Law being Spiritual, perfect and divine, Paul postures himself as unspiritual and imperfect though he has become a Christian. It is evident in Paul’s First Epistle to the Corinthians where he mentioned that ‘I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ (1 Corinthians 3:1) ’” It is apparent that Paul regards the Corinthian Christians to be in Christ though referred to as infants. Paul knows that as much as he is a Christian, he is susceptible to carnality as Cranfield has pointed out: “However, the implication leaves Paul marked by carnality as is opposed to God”, Cranfield explains further that “When carnality here is compared to that of chapter eight, we see that in Paul’s view this carnality in a believer is not carnal in the same unqualified manner that the unregenerate man is carnal. ” How is that so? By observing that the carnality of a Christian (as mentioned by Hendriksen earlier) is one whereby the Christian is not controlled by the sinful nature but the unregenerate man is controlled by the sinful nature because the Christian as reiterated may be fleshly but not in the flesh.
Consequently, what can be seen is this, John Stott interchanges law with principles, “’I discovered this principle at work. When I want to do good, evil is right there with me.(Romans 7:21)’ The antithesis of the good I want to do and the I beside whom evil lies . . . presents that the regenerate personality are simultaneously good and evil ”

WHY IT IS NOT THE PRE-CHRISTIAN DEPICTED

The Sinful Nature Cannot Submit to God’s Law

Now, the reason why it is not the pre-Christian Paul that is being depicted is this: (Romans 7:22)“For in my inner being I delight in God’s law”, with assumption that this is the regenerate or Christian Paul speaking, it is contrasted against Romans chapter eight verse seven where it says “The sinful mind is hostile to God. It does not submit to God’s law, nor can it do so” but back to chapter seven verse twenty-five it says “Consequently I with my mind serve the law of God”. John Murray makes it very poignant: the unregenerate man in the flesh in Romans chapter eight verse seven cannot submit to the law of God try as it might, it is futile but the regenerate man in Romans chapter seven verse twenty-two speaks of one who delights in God’s law and is after the inward man and in the preceding verses there is an antithesis of good and evil waging war in the principles of Paul’s mind which is very telling that Paul struggles with sin when he expresses his angst in saying “For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do... For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. For what I do is not the good I want to do; no, the evil I do not want to do—this I keep on doing.” (Romans 7:18-19)
Paul’s Former Way of Life: Faultless

Contrariwise to the imperfect man, where Paul postulates himself struggling with his conflicting ego, Paul’s pre-conversion experience seems to exhibit the very opposite of his deploring monologue. “(Philippians 3:4-6) Paul says ‘circumcised on the eighth day, of the people of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews; in regard to the law, a Pharisee; as for zeal, persecuting the church; as for legalistic righteousness, faultless [mine].’ And in (Galatians 1:13-14) Paul says, ‘For you have heard of my previous way of life in Judaism, how intensely I persecuted the church of God and tried to destroy it. I was advancing in Judaism beyond many Jews of my own age and was extremely zealous for the traditions of my fathers.’ John Piper puts it this way: “Paul hardly flinches nor bats an eyelid [mine] in torment or show any signs that he was in a dilemmatic state of being the divided man in Romans chapter seven but rather Paul depicted the man that was full of zeal for the law and its traditions and he says ‘as for legalistic righteousness, I was found
[mine] faultless.’ such was the sentiments Paul had for his pre-conversion experience .”

THE IMPLICATION OF PAULS IDENTITY FOR CHRISTIAN LIVING
In here, the implication of finding who this dilemmatic Paul found in (Romans 7:14-25) has on Christian perfectionism is the focus. An all-or-nothing view of God versus that of a progressive work of sanctification will be examined as well as an apathy to the effects of indwelling sin versus that of one having to embattle against these effects. Here, F.F. Bruce puts it succinctly that as far the believers goes, “he is only perfect as to his justification, but his sanctification has only begun. It is a progressive work.”
In first Thessalonians chapter four, Paul tells the Christians at Thessalonica “that it is the will of God, your sanctification...( 1 Thessalonians 4:3)” Does it mean the responsibility of sanctification lies on the Christian or it is God who is his sanctification? And what does sanctification mean? “Sanctification here denotes the moral and spiritual transformation of the regenerate believer and to be sanctified is to be conformed to the image of Christ because the believer is ‘in Christ’ and thus, the risen life of Christ is reproduced in the believer as he grows in grace and reflects the glory of his Lord. ”
Leon Morris puts it as such that Sanctification is both a demand which in that makes it a responsibility of the believer to live a sanctified live, as well as it is a gift of God. So while the need for Sanctification implies that the believer is imperfect, it is called upon the believer with the demand to live a life that is holy. John Piper however puts it this way, “When God calls you to himself, he justifies you freely by faith in Christ on the basis of Christ’s blood and righteousness, and he calls you to a life of holiness, which in this context refers explicitly to sexual purity. This (Sanctification)[mine] is the practical fruit of justification by faith.”
Therefore, God is not an ‘all-or nothing God’ because He provides His sanctification, equipping the Christian to Holiness, and underlying which, recognises the frailty of man. In that, no allowance is given for apathy because of God’s demand for Holiness.
Paul’s dilemmatic experience brings to surface an awareness of struggle towards sin a Christian undergoes and Paul recognises this principle, that says “I myself in my mind am a slave to God's law, but in the sinful nature a slave to the law of sin.( Romans 7: 25)” An ongoing battle with sin demands a progressive work of Sanctification.


Conclusion


A Christian is to take Paul’s dilemmatic experience and realise that Christianity is not an all or nothing religion as much as God is not an all or nothing God, but however, that does not give him into licentiousness but rather, the believer must understand that it is also a responsibility to sanctify himself as much as it is God who sanctifies.
The Christian ought to embattle against the residual effects of indwelling sin because the work of sanctification is progressive and in order that the Christian not despair at his imperfection but find fulfilment in the work of God in him, and working out in his disdain towards sin to which he struggles frantically with.
Therefore, the Christian in finding who the divided man in Romans 7:14-25 is, understand that it was the Christian Paul, and correspond his life as such which finds himself in a constant conflict wherein he does say along with Paul did, “For what I do is not the good I want to do; no, the evil I do not want to do—this I keep on doing. . . What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death? Thanks be to God—through Jesus Christ our Lord!(Romans 7:19,24) recognising that it is God’s sanctifying work in him which enables him to say as he did.

Friday, July 31, 2009

Learning journey through Biblical interpretation

One of the things I learnt during my journey learning Biblical interpretation is that there seems to be a similarity I would draw to interpreting a text to that of playing Soduku. There is firstly a logical sequence of things we ought to consider such as the Historical context, cultural, literary. We need to consider the thought flow of the author, why he wrote what he did.. Whereas in Soduku, there is just a logical sequence of numbers. We need also consider how the individual text is interpreted in light of the whole and the whole in light of the individual just as one number is to be seen in like manner in the 81 squares. As much as I would like to think that I could anyhow place the numbers as it deem fit, not every permutation would complete the puzzle. Finally, as much as the numbers are to be seen both as in a row and in a box of 9. How it applies could be : the row representing us moving ahead in life, it is not always necessary they have to be in running sequence as much as life isn’t presented so nicely, we move forward and progress even if after 1 isn’t 2 because eventually we’ll see all 9 digits in that row as a whole. Also, we see how 80 squares surrounds one square, so is it with us being one yet affecting and influencing the many surrounding us with all we have learnt. During the span of the course I have been given the skills and equipment to fish for a lifetime to which I can practice and make better the skill I have learnt rather than being given the fish I can only have once. Why? I tend to be very inquisitive about how a text is interpreted in it's proper context, especially when listening to sermons. It also provides me the tools to make an informed decision if a certain doctrine is sound. It helps me think through a text and note the flow of an argument, consider the literary context, audience, cultural context and historical context before coming to a verdict. Say for example, does Romans chapter 9 relate God's 'unconditional election' as reformed theology say it does?

I also learnt the dynamics of how a parable flows, through conflict, suspense, climax, etc... How not to make the common err of over- emphasizing details but seeing it as a whole, and from there the thrust of it's message it was intended. Speaking about errors, I also see some of the frequently used misappropriated texts by way of poor interpretation exposed.

This module has also taught me how to go about with how to do word study. Say for example,
For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth (Rom 10 v. 4).
τέλος; telos, does it mean that the Law has been put to the end, that is,it has been made obsolete through Christ or that Christ is the completion of the law, and we still are to obey the law? thus I must check an make comparisions on how the word 'telos' is used in different texts and what it means there and here.
Although this course had been tough sledding, having to work through and do an exegesis paper, it is at its finality a satisfaction and it's something to which I need make it a norm when studying the bible.
It is understandable however, the owners is mine hereon to keep myself at learning and practising the different forms of textual genres. Analyse them carefully and use the tools appropriately. When a Psalm is figurative or when it is to be taken literally, the expression therein, and how do I approach to apply it, such as that of imprecatory Psalms.
I think that this ability to interpret the scripture properly allows me to be a workman who need not be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth in this postmodern world where anything goes even as to how we read and interpret the bible, where unbalanced views are prevalent and where people misappropriate verses to justify their agendas. We live among many who assumes what he/she thinks is what it is or what it means and being able to interpret the Bible for what it is, is most essential for us and for me today.
I also learnt the dynamics of how a parable flows, through conflict, suspense, climax, etc... How not to make the common err of over- emphasizing details but seeing it as a whole, and from there the thrust of it's message it was intended. Speaking about errors, I also see some of the frequently used misappropriated texts by way of poor interpretation exposed.

This module has also taught me how to go about with how to do word study. Say for example,
For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth (Rom 10 v. 4).
τέλος; telos, does it mean that the Law has been put to the end, that is,it has been made obsolete through Christ or that Christ is the completion of the law, and we still are to obey the law? thus I must check an make comparisions on how the word 'telos' is used in different texts and what it means there and here.
Although this course had been tough sledding, having to work through and do an exegesis paper, it is at its finality a satisfaction and it's something to which I need make it a norm when studying the bible.
It is understandable however, the owners is mine hereon to keep myself at learning and practising the different forms of textual genres. Analyse them carefully and use the tools appropriately. When a Psalm is figurative or when it is to be taken literally, the expression therein, and how do I approach to apply it, such as that of imprecatory Psalms.
I think that this ability to interpret the scripture properly allows me to be a workman who need not be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth in this postmodern world where anything goes even as to how we read and interpret the bible, where unbalanced views are prevalent and where people misappropriate verses to justify their agendas. We live among many who assumes what he/she thinks is what it is or what it means and being able to interpret the Bible for what it is, is most essential for us and for me today.

Monday, May 18, 2009

Jonathan Edwards...

Jonathan Edwards, born on the 5th of October, 1703 in East Windsor, to Timothy Edwards, a Harvard-trained clergyman, and Esther Stoddard, descended from one of the most prominent families in Connecticut, of whom Jonathan was rather significantly influenced by, Solomon Stoddard, Esther’s father. Edwards grew up in a home in which he was the only son amongst ten other daughters, his sisters. One of the things that was rather intriguing about Jonathan Edward’s family background was that his father, father-in-law, grandfather, one of his sons, one of his sons-in-law and several grandsons, uncles and nephews were all ministers, he too was the grandfather of America’s third vice President, Aaron Burr.
His father, Timothy, provided the equivalent of grammar school and secondary education for the town’s children, providing a means of income as well as having his children to grow up among books, learning and languages. This proved to have quite an impact on Jonathan’s life, as a writer, at least for John Piper, who is greatly influenced by the life of Edwards, and thought of him as his “dead teacher”, expressed that being a writer himself the importance of reading, “I’ve been thinking again about the importance of reading and writing. There are several reasons I write. One of the most personally compelling is that I read. I mean, my main spiritual sustenance comes by the Holy Spirit from reading. Therefore reading is more important to me than eating. If I went blind, I would pay to have someone read to me. I would try to learn Braille. I would buy books on tape. I would rather go without food than go without books. Therefore, writing feels very life-giving to me, since I get so much so much from my own life from reading”. 1.
Jonathan had from a young age learned the scripture, the catechism, and the rich heritage of the reformed and puritan faith from both his parents of whom in particular, his mother founded fond acquaintances with the best theological writers in their books. Furthermore, Jonathan received from his father an education in pastoral ministry. Timothy’s experience of sixty-one years provided for Jonathan the privilege of shepherding a flock from many angles from which he could view. It was under his father, Timothy and his grandfather, Solomon Stoddard, did Jonathan honed his skills at preaching by observing the Pulpit orators at work, and it was at this school, “Connecticut River Valley School of Preaching” was where contributed to much of who He was that we now know.
His formal Education at Yale university, then known as the ‘Collegiate School of Connecticut’, in which Jonathan took subjects such as rhetoric, logic, ancient history, arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, metaphysics and natural sciences for his bachelor’s program were contributing factors to which had him writing broadly, broaching many subjects, in particular, his famous essay on the “flying Spider” which he hoped it would have found itself in the Publication in the transactions of the Royal Society. The writings of John Locke was also introduced to him who was reciprocated with much delight to which Jonathan discussed further at length in his “Treatise concerning Religious Affections”. In the sciences, Isaac Newton, in which He discerned in Newton’s work, the intimate and marvelous presence of God in His involvement in this world and His absolute necessity of God actively sustaining His creation, it came as a response to the writings of deists who thought it unnecessary that God should have any involvement in His creation. This contributed to a number of essays of which “The Wisdom of God in the Contrivance of the World”. It was also around this point, Jonathan continued his exploration into his reformed and puritan heritage and his studies alerted him to the errors of Arminianism. His preaching and his writing reflected his focus on stemming the tide of Arminianism’s influence and these are particularly seen in his works of ‘God Glorified in the Work of Redemption” and in his treatise “Freedom of the Will”, addressing on those issues in refutation and affirming his passion for the Sovereignty of God in all things.
The key factors by which God used Jonathan Edwards were formed as they were, and were seen in His writings which came from the education he received and the passion he had for God’s sovereignty, it revolved a lot around his family who played a very significant role as to how he developed his pastoral skills and how he related to the members of his congregation.
He was placed also at the time of the ‘Great Awakening’, although revival had been moving throughout America and George Whitefield was spreading revival in New England. but in Enfield, considered the most wicked community had not been moved. On July 8, 1741, in Enfield, Connecticut, Jonathan preached, using no gestures, he stood almost motionless, with his left elbow, he leaned on the pulpit, he held his notes. Using the text Deuteronomy 32 v. 25, “Their foot shall slide in due time”, also known as ‘Sinners in the Hands of an angry God”. It is described that “probably no sermon has ever had the effect of this one. It was interrupted by outcries from the congregation – men and women stood up and rolled on the floor, their cries once drowning out the voice of the preacher. Some are said to have laid hold on the pillars and braces of the church, apparently feeling that at that very moment their feet were sliding , that they were being precipitated into hell. All through the house one could hear the cries of those feeling lost, crying to God for mercy”. 2.
On 22nd June 1750, Jonathan Edwards faced dismissal from his congregation having had a conflict with them. It was over the practice established by Jonathan’s grandfather, Solomon Stoddard. Solomon had initiated the halfway covenant which allowed people to take the communion, those who have been baptized but had not yet professed Christ. Jonathan followed with this practice through the early years of his ministry though he had to it some reservations. Following the revivals in the mid 1730s and early 40s, Edward noticed many who had professed Christ trailing off in the commitments they had to the church. It was at this point that Jonathan genuinely took to questioning their religious experiences. And it was at this particular juncture that he wrote the famous sermon series ‘Treatise Concerning Religious Affections”. After weighing the potentially negative impact the half way covenant might have, he eventually did away with it. His doing was to the church’s elite, Jonathan’s undoing, it did not sit very well with them and soon Edwards and his congregation were deeply divided. Such were the effects congregationalism had on Jonathan in Northampton, as it did with his father, Timothy, having to be placed precariously in that, he was responsible for the Spiritual condition of the people which at times involved discipline which Jonathan in this case took to doing away with the practices of the half way covenant but on the other hand, both his salary and for that matter, his presence in church were contingent on the congregation’s vote. If the half way covenant was allowed to perpetuate till today, what would have been the condition of our churches today? Such were the feats Jonathan Edwards had to face up to, despite of unpopularity which would have and did cost him his position as pastor of the church.
Jonathan Edwards was considered to have been America’s greatest theologian, and as we have read, it is not just in his written works that gave him that entitlement, at least not for me, I see that Jonathan’s life reflected more than his works did. His treatises like as in the one concerning the ‘half way covenant’ clearly showed that Jonathan lived the word of God, his works of writing and preaching from the very passion he had for the sovereignty of God. He knew what was right, and did it to glorify God.
It is at this point where I’ll express as to how and where in the life of Jonathan Edward’s life influenced and motivated me to become a turning point where I am in the society.
Very personally, I saw that we are both Pastors’ kids, but as to how we responded to the expectations placed on us, was very different. He took to every opportunity given him by his father and grandfather to rise up as a turning point in his own generation, with a tenacious passion for the sovereignty of God.
I was intermittently passionate, indifferent and at some points rebellious with regards to my relationship to God. His life has inspired me to be teachable and humble, taking every opportunity under the tutelage of my father to pick up pastoral skills, discerning and observing the Spiritual environment of the congregation so that I may be to God not just an available vessel but a workman that needs not be ashamed at handling the word to make much of God and His sovereignty and His glory in wherever I am, in my life, cell group, ministry and church, also to the community. I’ll in my own life and given where I am, studying in the Bible school like did Edwards did, I’ll passionately study and give all that I am into Theology and the Word of God academically so that I might let God add to me not just in head knowledge but also savor the reality of God so that I can minister to those around me, producing fruits, if I can put it this way, that those around may see and savor the goodness of who God is. Being also an intern in church, whilst studying, I too am exposed to the various ministries to where I can contribute as well as to pick up skills to which God may add to me more whereby I can serve, being equipped with experience, skills, word and Spirit. Given that God has placed me as a Pastor’s son, I too ask my father questions and listen to matters concerning the church. Ah! Although congregationalism isn’t so prevalent where we are, I am aware of complains made about the pastors which can decide their “fate” whether or not to move them to other ministries or at worse, dismiss them. So it is in this that must be kept in mind that I must do what I know is right in the eyes of God and not to the popularity of the people, while at best living a life that is without blame that none should point a finger, I can’t please everybody.
I hope I am right, by self-perception, my gift is in writing and if that be so, I am even as it is, very inspired by Edward’s literary works. I aspire to write from a proper understanding of God’s word, inspired by the Holy Spirit to the edification of those who read. I kept a blog to write that which God puts into my heart so as to build people up and I seek to glorify God passionately not just in what I have written but also through my life, teaching and preaching not just by word of mouth but impassioned to glorify God in my life, governed by the word of God through which I speak to make much of God’s sovereignty. It was said that Edwards preached God and only God and not never about himself. The glory and passion for God’s sovereignty is the highlight of His life which I want to embrace and make my own to transform my generation. What stands out is that over and above his church and ministry, He took time with his family and his children, with whom he expressed deep affections for his wife and also his children in his letters to them when they’re away. It is a balance to which I seek to have because every facet of our lives ought to be worship to God, without negating any part of ourselves to making much of the reality of God’s glory. The glory of God should be made seen in all of His beauty like that of a jig-saw puzzle, no piece missing but completely depicting the image we were made and meant to show with our whole being devoted and passionate for the Sovereignty of God and for His glory.

1. John Piper, A Godward life, The ripple Effect of the Word, thoughts on reading and writing, Multnomah Publishers Inc. Post Office Box 1720, Sisters, Oregon 97759

2. Compiled by Peter E. Gunther, Sermon Classics by Great Preachers, Sinners in the hands of an angry God, by Jonathan Edwards, copyrighted 1960, 1982 by The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago, Revised Ed.

3. Stephen J. Nichols, Jonathan Edwards, A guided tour of His life and thought, P&R Publishing company, P.O. box 817, Philipsburg, New Jersey 08865-0817.

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Faith as it is..

Text: 1Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see. (Hebrews 11 v. 1)
Thesis statement: Living a radical life of faith, seeing, running and grasping after that which God has called us to in Christ.
Introduction:
Faith, what really is it?
Faith is believing and acting on the will of God to which He puts into our heart by His Holy Spirit.
Nowadays, we see ‘active faith’ being preached with regards to living our talk and walk as Christians. Well, I think to say ‘active faith’ is extraneous superfluity based on the book of James because Faith by itself is active by nature, if not, it is not faith and that is the thrust to which James was exerting Himself on and not that we are saved by works and not on faith alone. You’d probably realise that it is extraneously superfluous in saying ‘extraneous superfluity’ in making out of what ‘active faith’ was because it leaves with us the notion that faith by itself isn’t active so much that we have to add ‘active’ to what we think faith is, and that is exactly the mindset to which we think of faith today, isn’t it? That faith is believe devoid of action. Not all beliefs constitutes as faith although faith does constitute believe. Thus It is an erroneous belief to believe faith is devoid of action as much that we have to add ‘active’ to faith.
Faith isn’t presumptuous. It seems that today, the Christian’s concept of faith is how we want it to be, contributed by this postmodern society. We often think, we have a ‘free will’ and thus since that is so God-given, my life is how I want it to be and my faith is made out of vain desires of which God blesses me and showers me with His grace and He’d grant me these desires of my heart when I delight myself in Him. Well, presumption can come in a more subtle form when it comes to things like choosing a life partner, your career path, ministry perhaps… ? directions to take at crossroads in life, etc.. and if its presumptuousness we have with regards to faith, it is not faith and it is yet again an erroneous notion, a very thin ice we’re walking on.
Faith then is :
Seeing : (v. 8) 8By faith Abraham, when called to go to a place he would later receive as his inheritance, obeyed and went, even though he did not know where he was going. 9By faith he made his home in the promised land like a stranger in a foreign country; he lived in tents, as did Isaac and Jacob, who were heirs with him of the same promise. 10For he was looking forward to the city with foundations, whose architect and builder is God.
Faith is seeing God’s perfect will and plan laid before us but it is often time either we’re too obstinate or we doubt and fear. Faith is like a lens, allowing us to have a glimpse of what God has set before us. God has set Christ as our focus, the author and perfecter of our faith because He has been there and done (2Let us fix our eyes on Jesus, the author and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy set before him endured the cross, scorning its shame, and sat down at the right hand of the throne of God. v. 2)
that and now sits at the right hand of God and in Him lies our very impetus, our driving factor to live and die for Him to which Apostle Paul is confident of saying, “ For me to live is Christ and to die is gain”. And when He said “7We live by faith, not by sight.”. It is seeing not how circumstances appear which makes for us barriers and obstacles which causes us to lose hope but rather, faith is seeing, and responding with confidence, and being able to say yet again as Paul did “28And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose. (Rom. 8 v. 28) Because we’re more than conquerors through Him who love us (Rom. 8 v. 37). And this faith propelled Abraham to see and was able to look at the city of whom its architect and builder is God Himself (v. 10). When we have faith, it is “almost as if” we’re elevated to see things as God does, yet leaning on His gracious and everlasting arms, waiting on Him.
4For from days of old they have not heard or perceived by ear,
Nor has the eye seen a God besides You,
Who acts in behalf of the one who waits for Him. (Isaiah 64 v. 4)
Faith is seeing reality as it is, recognizing God is a realist because He created reality. And reality is that life isn’t and doesn’t always work out the way we want it to be but every circumstance is an opportunity to depend on God, and in His love are we more than conquerors, so that we do not as much become subject to our circumstance than we make our circumstance a subject to which we glorify God for His all sufficient grace when we look right at Christ with faith, and it is His will that we give Him praise for the glory of His grace.

Running:
1Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, let us throw off everything that hinders and the sin that so easily entangles, and let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us. (Hebrews 12 v. 1)
Faith is running towards that which God has called us to, and not merely strolling as if life was like a walk in the park.
It is marked by
i) Perseverance
ii) Excellence; 24Do you not know that in a race all the runners run, but only one gets the prize? Run in such a way as to get the prize. (1 Cor. 9 v. 24)
Which makes faith a fight as well as Paul also puts it “7I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith.” (2 Tim. 4 v. 7). We’re embattling against our sinful nature as well as the hustle and bustle of life which oftentimes makes our existence a bane and pain so much that Nietzsche, in His Philosophical work ‘Thus Spoke Zarathustra’ said that one is to overcome himself by ‘will to power’. And to that it was commented that Nietzsche used concepts pertaining to Christianity somewhat and that ‘Will to power’ is equivocally compared to that of the Christian concept of ‘Grace’. However, grace is never of ourselves that we should boast, it is God’s unmerited gift to save us and it’s the impetus that propels us to live for Him, and by His grace are we able to run this race with perseverance knowing fully well that it is never by our effort and we have complete assurance that if we are in Him, nothing can separate us from His love.
38For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons,[a] neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, 39neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord. (Rom. 8 v. 38-39)
It is such, that when His love so compels us, it propels us also to serve Him with excellence!
9For I am the least of the apostles and do not even deserve to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. 10But by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace to me was not without effect. No, I worked harder than all of them—yet not I, but the grace of God that was with me. (1 Cor. 15 v. 9-10)
His grace is so efficacious that it works in and through us, saving, sanctifying and supplying us with His strength to do the work to which He has called us. Ministry is never there to really be called ours but rather entrusted to us to perform not by our own strength but by His Holy Spirit and Grace in our lives working out that which He is working in us, increasing our capacity and ability while molding us to perfection.
6being confident of this, that he who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion until the day of Christ Jesus. (Phil 1 v. 6)

Grasping:
12Not that I have already obtained all this, or have already been made perfect, but I press on to take hold of that for which Christ Jesus took hold of me. 13Brothers, I do not consider myself yet to have taken hold of it. But one thing I do: Forgetting what is behind and straining toward what is ahead, 14I press on toward the goal to win the prize for which God has called me heavenward in Christ Jesus. (Phil. 3 v. 12-14)
Faith is grasping hold of God, recognizing that we need Him and the more we know Him, we’d love Him more and more, and the more we love Him, we’d want to know Him more and more, leaning on Him and depending on Him. If we do not, we’d be stagnant where we are…
…A large crowd followed and pressed around him. 25And a woman was there who had been subject to bleeding for twelve years. 26She had suffered a great deal under the care of many doctors and had spent all she had, yet instead of getting better she grew worse. 27When she heard about Jesus, she came up behind him in the crowd and touched his cloak, 28because she thought, "If I just touch his clothes, I will be healed." 29Immediately her bleeding stopped and she felt in her body that she was freed from her suffering.
30At once Jesus realized that power had gone out from him. He turned around in the crowd and asked, "Who touched my clothes?"
31"You see the people crowding against you," his disciples answered, "and yet you can ask, 'Who touched me?' "
32But Jesus kept looking around to see who had done it. 33Then the woman, knowing what had happened to her, came and fell at his feet and, trembling with fear, told him the whole truth. 34He said to her, "Daughter, your faith has healed you. Go in peace and be freed from your suffering." (Mark 5 v. 24-34)
We could either sit there and kept believing and do nothing about our condition or we could believe and act upon His will, and His will is that you be healed from whatever condition you have that hinders and incapacitates you from being conformed into the image of Christ, being transformed from glory to glory… He wills to grant you a breakthrough each and everyday, and revealing Himself to you in a fresh dimension to Himself if only we’d get out n grasp hold of the hem of His garment. To sit there and do nothing is to act out of presumption and dwell on the “what ifs…. What if I reach out and touch and nothing happens?”.. and so we sit where we are and do our own thing, which wears us out in suffering the consequences of our weaknesses and frailty, it is when we grasp on to Him that His strength is made perfect in our weaknesses.